<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ambivalence About Illegal Immigration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roblimo.com/node/289/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roblimo.com/node/289</link>
	<description>Observations about politics, the Internet, and other random topics</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 11:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe Shea</title>
		<link>http://www.roblimo.com/node/289#comment-93777</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Shea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 09:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roblimo.com/node/289#comment-93777</guid>
		<description>I think amnesty is the answer, but the immigration bill proposed by Kennedy, MvcCain and others came very close. I think every country that has built a fence around itself in recent history has ended up with people wanting to get out, not in.  Your ambivalemce very much reflects the questions most Americans have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think amnesty is the answer, but the immigration bill proposed by Kennedy, MvcCain and others came very close. I think every country that has built a fence around itself in recent history has ended up with people wanting to get out, not in.  Your ambivalemce very much reflects the questions most Americans have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pudge</title>
		<link>http://www.roblimo.com/node/289#comment-92841</link>
		<dc:creator>pudge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 06:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roblimo.com/node/289#comment-92841</guid>
		<description>It IS NOT POSSIBLE to deport all, or even a significant portion of, the illegal immigrants, not without significant death and destruction.  Period.  No one can solve this problem.  It is not solvable.  At the very least, you would have massive violent protests stemming from any such action.  There is simply no possibility of anything else.  You're dreaming.

As to your line about states not meaning anything, it shows that you are completely non-serious when you say "I believe in enforcing our laws."  Sure, you can offer a constitutional amendment, but until you do, respect for our laws requires respecting the fact that the federal government has no legal authority to enforce a national I.D. card.

I am not necessarily against such a thing.  But even if I really wanted it, I don't pretend that just because I want something, that it's therefore OK to ignore the law to get it done.

Also, this is odd: "I don’t believe in amnesty programs, however cloaked and renamed, for crimes more major than illegal parking or failing to return library materials by their due date."  So why not amnesty for being in this country illegally?  In fact, being here illegally is no more "major" than illegal parking.  That's what our law says.  It's a mere infraction, no worse than a parking ticket.  That the penalty for it -- deportation -- seems severe is merely a matter of perspective (for our law, it is just returning someone to where they belong, not an actual punishment per se); it is not an actual indication of severity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It IS NOT POSSIBLE to deport all, or even a significant portion of, the illegal immigrants, not without significant death and destruction.  Period.  No one can solve this problem.  It is not solvable.  At the very least, you would have massive violent protests stemming from any such action.  There is simply no possibility of anything else.  You&#8217;re dreaming.</p>
<p>As to your line about states not meaning anything, it shows that you are completely non-serious when you say &#8220;I believe in enforcing our laws.&#8221;  Sure, you can offer a constitutional amendment, but until you do, respect for our laws requires respecting the fact that the federal government has no legal authority to enforce a national I.D. card.</p>
<p>I am not necessarily against such a thing.  But even if I really wanted it, I don&#8217;t pretend that just because I want something, that it&#8217;s therefore OK to ignore the law to get it done.</p>
<p>Also, this is odd: &#8220;I don’t believe in amnesty programs, however cloaked and renamed, for crimes more major than illegal parking or failing to return library materials by their due date.&#8221;  So why not amnesty for being in this country illegally?  In fact, being here illegally is no more &#8220;major&#8221; than illegal parking.  That&#8217;s what our law says.  It&#8217;s a mere infraction, no worse than a parking ticket.  That the penalty for it &#8212; deportation &#8212; seems severe is merely a matter of perspective (for our law, it is just returning someone to where they belong, not an actual punishment per se); it is not an actual indication of severity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.roblimo.com/node/289#comment-92804</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 01:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roblimo.com/node/289#comment-92804</guid>
		<description>Excellent analysis....I value all objective information on this subject....Rob in San Diego</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent analysis&#8230;.I value all objective information on this subject&#8230;.Rob in San Diego</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
